Obsolete Model: The Car
New Model: The Human
Obsolete Model: The Car
“The spirit of generosity already threatened by the horse, evaporated entirely with the motor car.”
– Bruce Chatwin in his Patagonia notebook
I’m about to buy a car. And I don’t like it. I wish I didn’t have to.
I’ve had an issue with cars for a long time now. I don’t remember disliking them as a kid or teenager, so I can’t see any hidden psychological traumas that I have oppressed. In my 20s, I thought cars were great for getting to the French or Austrian Alps to snowboard. My friends and I always had some old rubbish car for that reason. But I don’t remember ever liking cars. They were more of a tool for getting far away from boring university studies.
I have owned cars a few times, but have always had problems with them. One lost the exhaust pipe in the Moroccan desert, one caught on fire on a French Autoroute, and one was stolen in East London. And I’ve always disliked buying and selling cars. Cars are very expensive to most people and the large sums of money, which change hands in these transactions create mistrust between all parts that are involved.
But these days my issue with cars is not with my own car or other peoples’ cars. It’s with cars in general. The car.
I think we can now declare the car an obsolete model which needs to be replaced. Why? Well, let’s look at a couple of things.
- Cars pollute
- Cars kill playing children and insecure teenagers
- Cars lead to unhealthy behaviour (sitting down in a metal bubble instead of walking)
- Cars are expensive and terrible investments
- Cars are inefficient as a means of transport in urban areas
- Cars lead to road rage
- Cars can take me anywhere quickly once outside a city centre.
- Cars give me freedom
- Some cars are beautiful
- It’s fun to drive too fast with a car
- My car is a place which I like as I’m on my own there. It’s my temple. A place for reflection.
And so on… We all know these things. A cost-benefit analysis would perhaps be more favorable to cars in remote areas, but in urban areas there is no reason for cars.
New model: The Human
A recent report I read said that human drivers will disappear within a generation. I was a bit disappointed. I had hoped that they will disappear before that. But most people agree that self-driving cars will transform our lives when they come.
I’m curious to see whether self-driving vehicles will solve my problems and still give me the benefits with cars, mentioned in the cost/benefit analysis above.
Let’s list everything again and see if the self-driving car will change life for the better:
||Won’t be solved, the self-driving car will still pollute, but much fuel will be saved.
|Cars lead to unhealthy behaviour (sitting down in a metal bubble instead of walking)
||Won’t be solved. We’ll still get fatter and move less.
|Cars are inefficient as a means of transport in urban areas.
||Won’t be solved. Yes, there will be less congestion, but cities will still be packed with cars.
|Cars kill playing children and insecure teenagers
||This will be solved! Self-driving cars cannot kill children or teenage drivers.
|Cars are expensive and terrible investments
||No change (but at least insurance costs will go down)
|Cars lead to road rage
||Will be solved! We will relax with a book or DVD instead of raging against our fellow machines and motorists.
|Cars can take me anywhere quickly once outside a city centre.
|Cars give me freedom
||Same. Future Jack Keroac’s can now even write as they “keep on rolling under the stars”.
|Some cars are beautiful
||No change. Some cars will still be beautiful.
|It’s fun to drive too fast with a car
||This will not be possible any more. Hoons and revheads will disappear and have to get their testosterone levels balanced elsewhere.
|My car is a place which I like as I’m on my own there. It’s my temple. A place for reflection.
||No change. My car will still be a place for reflection.
Yes, the self-driving car will solve some of my issues, but not all of them. We need a better model than the self-driving car. A self-driving car is perhaps what the electric typewriter was to the typewriter; a solution which seemed logical at the time, but didn’t stop the innovation from being disrupted.
I wonder what will disrupt the car in the same way as the car disrupted the horse. I suggest the human.
This blog post is part of a series, which started with some of my issues.. I call this the irresponsibility series, as my inner conservative tells me that the posts and thoughts here are “utterly, completely irresponsible”. In the series, I discuss obsolete and new models for five things which I have issues with: Democracy, Hard Work, Cars, Heroic (or Dickhead) Entrepreneurship and Settling. This series is based on Buckminster Fuller’s excellent quote, which has inspired many of us;
“You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”